Fictional demonstration report

Year 8 Deep Dive — Sample

A realistic example showing the type of analysis, interpretation and recommendations a client could receive.

Illustrative sample only: All figures, findings and pupil-group patterns on this page are fictional and are included solely to demonstrate the style of analysis a school could receive.

Executive summary

The year-group picture is mixed and requires targeted rather than blanket intervention. English and RE provide the strongest attainment picture, while Science is the clearest subject-level priority, with only 41% of pupils reaching Secure+. SEND is the most significant cross-curricular concern: the gap is substantial in both Mathematics and Science and warrants pupil-level diagnosis to identify whether the same pupils are driving underperformance across subjects. HPA attainment is comparatively strong, but leaders should test whether secure performance is consistently converting into the highest attainment bands. The immediate leadership priorities are therefore to diagnose the SEND gap, validate the Science assessment picture and strengthen HPA conversion.

Overall Secure+58%

PP Secure+48%

SEND Secure+31%

HPA Adv+72%

Subject picture

Subject	Cohort Avg	Secure+	PP Gap	SEND Gap	Priority
English	61%	70%	-4pp	-12pp	Medium
Maths	54%	59%	-5pp	-17pp	High
Science	47%	41%	-7pp	-19pp	High
RE	63%	72%	-2pp	-10pp	Low

What the numbers mean

SEND: The gap is not confined to one subject. The first response should be pupil-level diagnosis rather than a generic intervention for every SEND pupil.

Science: Low Secure+ alongside weaker group outcomes suggests a need to examine both assessment evidence and the pupils contributing most strongly to the gap.

HPA: Strong averages should not obscure conversion. Review subjects where HPA pupils are secure but are not reaching the highest attainment bands.

Leadership questions

1. Which individual pupils are contributing most strongly to the SEND gaps, and are the same pupils appearing across Mathematics and Science?

2. Is the Science picture primarily a curriculum, assessment or cohort issue — and what does question-level evidence show?

3. Are HPA pupils consistently converting secure attainment into the highest bands across all subjects?

Recommended next steps

Identify the pupils contributing most strongly to the SEND gap in Mathematics and Science.
Moderate Science assessment and review question-level patterns before intervention is planned.
Set a short review cycle with a clear baseline and agreed success measures.
Track HPA conversion to the highest attainment bands by subject.
Report progress using the same measures at the next assessment point.

All figures and findings on this page are fictional and are included for demonstration purposes only. A commissioned report would be tailored to the school’s agreed questions, dataset and priorities.

Want this analysis for your school?

Tell us what you need to understand and we will agree the scope, data required and price before any work begins.

Request an analysis